by CA Pritam Mahure | May 5, 2017
With each passing day, India seems to be marching towards the Goods and Services Tax (GST) slated for introduction from July 1, 2017. There are still several areas of doubt for taxpayers on the overall law and its implementation, and the Anti-Profiteering Provision seems to be at the forefront of things.
On April 22nd, the Centre and states agreed on the broad contours of two crucial GST bills: the draft Central GST Bill and the draft Integrated GST bill. The Central GST law, as passed by the Parliament, contains an anti-profiteering clause that mandates the manufacturer and others in the supply chain to pass on the benefits arising during the transition phase from current tax regime to GST regime, to the consumers.
Globally, Australia is said to be the first country to introduce an anti-profiteering provision during GST introduction in the year 2000, followed by Malaysia in the year 2015. Though there are no empirical studies to prove its benefits, the Government appears to be inclined to experiment with these provisions in India as well.
The provision in the Central GST Act - Section 171, mandates that benefits arising due to either lower tax rates or more tax credits being available in the GST regime should be passed on to the consumer by way of commensurate reduction in prices. This section also empowers the Government to constitute an authority or entrust an existing authority to ensure compliance of anti-profiteering provisions. Therefore, it is of paramount importance for companies to set up processes to compute the likely benefits and have a plan to ensure smooth passage of the benefits to the consumer.
Currently, guidelines to compute the benefits have not been prescribed, yet taxpayers can compute the likely benefit at a broader level. The provision categorizes the likely benefits in two baskets:
At present, Central Sales Tax (CST) is a cost in the supply chain, while in GST regime there will be no CST. This could be construed as a benefit arising due to transition to GST. Today service providers cannot claim credit of VAT paid on goods, and traders cannot claim credit of excise/ countervailing duty and service tax. Going forward, these credits are expected to accrue to a taxpayer. Taxpayer should identify these benefits arising on account of transition to GST at organizational level.
Tax benefits can also be computed at the product level based on a cost sheet.
Once benefits arising from credit are captured, the next step should be to compute benefits from rate reduction, if any. This benefit may be computed at the product level.
Say, for example, one unit of toothpaste of Rs. 10 attracts excise and VAT of Rs 3 today. If GST payable on toothpaste is Rs. 2, then Rs. 1 would be the likely benefit.
While the above steps provide clarity in understanding how much benefit is arising at the manufacturing level, the company will also have to ensure that their vendors pass on the benefits by way of price reduction. To do this, the company will be required to get cost data from vendors. Once details are shared by vendors, their veracity should be verified by the company or through an independent firm. In case vendors are not willing to share details, some sample cost sheets can be prepared based on industry knowledge. The expected amount of benefits thus arrived at could be shared with vendors for confirmation and used for negotiation.
To ensure that vendors comply with the companys requests, it is advisable to add an appropriate anti-profiteering clause in the vendor agreement stating that that the vendor agrees to comply with anti-profiteering provisions and to share authentic and verified data to ensure that the benefit is appropriately passed on in accordance with the provisions. Going a step further, the clause can also state that in case appropriate benefit is not passed to the customer, then the vendor will be held accountable to pay any future disputed liability along with interest, fine, penalty, litigation cost etc.
The anti-profiteering provisions in the GST bill are very brief, leaving enough room for misperceptions and perplexities. While the two steps mentioned above can help the company prepare for business conducted in the future, there are several questions on the business at hand that still remain unanswered. Questions such as how to change MRPs if products are already at the retail store, Is compliance mandatory even if the product is covered under drug pricing control order etc. still need clarifications.
For questions such as these, taxpayers need to be vigilant to announcements from the government on the topic and plan their processes accordingly.
Lets hope that the ant-profiteering provisions are not perceived as anti-industry and the Government issues detailed guidelines to ensure that industry specific challenges are appropriately addressed.
IRIS has been in the financial compliance space for over 2 decades having worked with regulators and filing entities alike. In India, we have supported MCA filings for over 700 entities including companies of groups such as Tata, Reliance, TVS, Godrej, L&T etc. We are now combining our deep domain capabilities with our strong technology backbone to bring you IRIS GST, an end to end GST filing solution.
If you have any questions or would like to know how IRIS GST can help you, please write to email@example.com.