by CA Pritam Mahure | March 23, 2017
The banking sector is one of the largest services sectors in India. The implementation of the Goods & Services Tax (GST) will likely prove to be a challenge for the sector on two counts - First, due to the higher GST rates compared to the current service tax rate (read here: how GST Rates Could Impact Your Business Strategies) and second, due to the vast geographical reach of most banks.
With the GST coming close on the heels of demonetization, the banking sector needs to ensure that they are ready for this new tax regime.
In this article, we will cover 4 critical implications of GST on the banking sector to help banks plan their GST implementation strategy.
GST is a parallel tax regime where the States and the Center, tax the payer in one go. Hence, banks may need to obtain State-wise registration in every State where they have a branch. In case a bank has multiple branches in one State, only one registration is required for all the branches in that State.
However, most banks have a multi-state presence. State-wise registration will therefore lead to a substantial increase in compliance levels, especially because most banks have obtained a centralized registration under service tax. So, currently, a bank may be filing only two returns on an annual basis as a service tax assesse, but with GST, the bank might be required to file as many as 61 returns per year for every State they are present in (five returns per month plus one annual return).
GST is a place of supply based tax regime. Hence, for every transaction in GST, the bank will need to determine the place of consumption where GST will be paid. With bank branches conducting several transactions, both within and outside States, determining the place of supply will not be very easy.
The Model GST Law casts the onus of determining whether a transaction is intra-state or inter-state on the assesse. So, banks will need to decide whether the payment is against Central GST (CGST) and State GST (SGST) or Integrated GST (IGST), based on the type of transaction.
Moreover, inter-state supplies of goods or services (or both) between two branches of the same bank, located in two States, will also attract IGST. The GST charged will be available as credit to the receiving branch; however, tracking such transactions could prove to be a cumbersome task.
Services being intangible in nature, proxy rules/ provisions are prescribed in the GST framework to help the assessee determine the place of consumption. Though, typically, the place of consumption for banking services (as per revised draft IGST Act) is the location of the recipient of services on the records of the supplier. But there is ample scope for wrong determination for a pan-India bank as there could be a dispute on who the service recipient is.
Further, in cases where there is a dispute over the place of supply of services, the taxpayer may get entangled in legal disputes. Currently, the GST legislation provides that if an assessee wrongly pays, say CGST and SGST (on a belief that the transaction is intra-state), instead of IGST, then they will have to pay the correct taxes (i.e. IGST) again and claim a refund for wrongfully paid taxes.
Ideally, instead of putting the onus on the taxpayer to determine whether the transaction is intra-state or inter-state, the GST law should provide for a simpler redressal mechanism.
In the current tax regime, the service tax legislation does not tax interest. But with GST, the term service is defined in a wide manner to cover anything other than goods which may cover interest as well.
Governments across the world do not levy GST on interest given the fact that there is always a debate on whether interest is the time value of money or a consideration for lending money. The GST Law in India too should clarify if interest is outside the ambit of GST. If interest is not expected to attract GST, it will have implications on input tax credits claimed by banks.
With GST, services are expected to attract 18% GST. This rate is higher by 3% from the current service tax rate of 15%. This may make banking services such as issue of cheque books and demand drafts more expensive, particularly for retail customers.
Another point to note is that these days banks also deal in commodities such as gold / silver where a concessional GST rate is expected to be applicable. Therefore banks need to be careful in paying GST with the appropriate applicable rate on different products.
Banks have always been a huge pillar of the Indian economy and taxpayers are literally banking on them for GST payments / financial needs. Given this, the GST Council must provide clarity on GST for the banking sector and shed light on several open ended issues that are plaguing them currently.
IRIS has been in the compliance space for over 2 decades having worked with regulators and filing entities alike. On one hand, our solutions power the likes of the Reserve Bank of India and Bank of Mauritius on the regulatory side, and on the other, we support banks in meeting their compliance filing requirements (FATCA, XBRL, FIU Reporting) and offer solutions for CRILC analytics.
If you would like to know more about our GST filing solution, or if you have any questions, please write to Pritam@irisgst.com